TN
That U.S. opportunity is worth a conversation. Explore professional work through the TN pathway.
A professional offer, a company transfer and a shared business purchase can raise different questions within one household. From LaSalle, prepare each person’s duties, ownership and relationship evidence before choosing a route or committing to a moving date.
U.S. visa support for Canadians
ready for what’s next.
TN is available to eligible Canadian and Mexican citizens with prearranged professional work in an occupation that actually appears on the USMCA list. L-1A covers a qualifying transfer into a managerial or executive role; L-1B covers a qualifying transfer into a specialized-knowledge role — the two require different evidence and are not interchangeable. E-2 concerns a treaty investor developing and directing a genuine enterprise through a substantial, at-risk investment. EB-5 is an immigrant investor category requiring qualifying capital and U.S. job creation, with a reduced capital threshold available only where a project actually qualifies as a targeted-employment-area or infrastructure investment. Gold Card refers to the current federal gift-and-processing-fee framework toward EB-1 or EB-2 residence, and does not replace either category's own eligibility rules. Which of these questions is even relevant to a person in this household depends on citizenship, the employer or ownership relationship, and their own documented history.
Choose what brings you here. Leave with a short list of things to discuss—not another long form to fill out.
Start from the tasks actually assigned this specific person.

Identify the one document that actually created each person's opportunity in this household — an offer letter, a corporate transfer memo, a sale agreement, a partnership proposal — and read it for what it commits to versus what remains open. Add the credential, employment, or funding history that supports it. Build an honest, testable account for each person rather than a single household narrative organized around whichever plan currently sounds simplest.
Meet the people in your cornerPersonal support.
A practical plan.
No promises we can’t keep.
State plainly what work, transfer, or investment each household member is proposing, for which entity, and under whose control. Two people at the same address do not share one set of facts.
For each important statement, name the specific document or person able to verify it. Where nothing currently can, mark the point unresolved instead of folding it into a tidy narrative.
Compare the household's actual facts against the citizenship, employment, ownership, or investment terms a category actually requires, rather than starting from whichever label a family member already prefers.
Combine the legal steps, any commercial conditions on a sale or purchase, and each person's personal deadlines, so the household can see which items still depend on a decision nobody has actually made.
A decided category, or even a single agreed household plan, is not a prerequisite for a first conversation. Bring each person's situation as it currently stands and be clear about which decision the household is actually trying to make. A plant job offer, a new-office assignment complicated by an ownership stake, and a co-invested small business can each need different records and different professional input.
Find your pathwayPrepare a short, factual account of each person's circumstances and the specific questions that need review. Confirm what a consultation actually covers, and its cost, before sending a complete file for more than one household member. Immigration eligibility, corporate and real-estate transaction review, and tax exposure are frequently separate questions even within one household.
Let’s connectArrange a remote consultation to discuss your next steps.
Cohabitation alone does not establish a qualifying spouse. A common-law relationship can qualify only if it is legally recognized as a valid marriage under the relevant law; a domestic-partner label is not enough. Have the actual relationship and its legal documentation assessed before assuming spousal dependent eligibility.
Not automatically, but it needs to be disclosed and reviewed. The evidence still has to show the U.S. role will be primarily managerial or executive and that the corporate relationship and employment history independently qualify; an ownership stake is a fact to be assessed, not an automatic bar or an automatic advantage.
It can. The share of proceeds actually belonging to the investor, and how the money passed from the sale to the business, both need to be documented. A joint sale with a co-owner is not the same evidentiary record as a sole owner's proceeds.
Not necessarily. Each person's timeline runs on its own facts. Waiting on one file can needlessly delay another person's review when the two situations do not actually depend on each other.
Editorial source review: 2026-09-07.
Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.